Is this really an issue? Can’t you just be kind and inclusive?
Yes, it’s an issue. Advocating for kindness and inclusivity to males in women’s sports to the detriment of women is being a men’s rights advocate. Just so we’re clear.
This issue may not affect you, and that’s fine (in fact, it’s great). The fact remains that only one male participating in a high school track and field event has such a significant advantage that the male will more often than not place first, if not top three, pushing every female down a rank, which means a biological female loses a medal, a trophy, a title, an opportunity to go to State Finals…and potentially a future college opportunity.
- women’s sports were created to give females athletic opportunities…not to give trans identified males athletic opportunities.
- females cannot compete with males athletically. This is sex based, not gender identity based. Even trans identified females who are injecting testosterone (effectively, this is doping if they were competing against women) struggle to compete meaningfully in men’s sports and only a very tiny handful have made traction.
- effectively, there is no equalizer on the other side. Every single male playing high school, NCAA and professional level sports directly takes an opportunity, medal, title, sponsorship opportunity, scholarship or prize from a woman.
- males set records in women’s sports that females cannot ever achieve or surpass…that’s not inclusive to women in their own sports, it’s insulting and demoralizing. It’s unfair.
- more males are in women’s sports than you think – media will almost never reference it so don’t make assumptions about this issue because it doesn’t affect you directly and you don’t read/hear about it in the news. How many women must experience it before you think it matters? 5? 100? 2000? 1,000,000? What is the number?
- one must ponder the cognitive dissonance of believing that negatively impacting an entire group of historically marginalized people who are biologically and physically disadvantaged in sports is justified in order to be ‘kind’ to the feelings a small group of historically privileged and athletically advantaged people? Who is the priority in women’s sports, males or females? Who was Title IX designed to protect?
.
Are there really that many males participating in women’s sports anyway?
Irrelevant and a distraction and YES.
Truth: If small numbers or small percentages don’t matter, then the number of males wanting to play in women’s sports don’t matter either and then we can just ban it. No worries at all, because they don’t matter.
Here’s the problem….it only takes one male in a women’s track meet to take the first place spot on the podium and beat every female at the entire meet. It’s called…TESTOSTERONE. You know, the banned performance enhancer that the girls aren’t allowed inject. And a teenage male produces more in three weeks than a teenage girl produces in an entire year. Yeah…that one.
Let’s all stop pretending that in competitive sports it doesn’t matter where athletes rank, and what titles, medals and accolades they hold. They *are* considered when she applies to a private high school, club and travel teams, college or NCAA opportunities and associated scholarships. They affect her self esteem and her pride, and frankly we ban testosterone because it’s a performance enhancing sterroid…so why are we allowing people who produce more in a single day than a girl produces in a month to compete and applaud them, and pretend that on any level they don’t have performance advantages.
High school male athletes competing in women’s categories are not mandated to be on puberty blockers or take female hormones, and they are not tested.
Congratulations to every single person on the left who’s been campaigning to destroy women’s and girls’ rights. Without you, there’d be no images like this.
J.K. Rowling
Don’t take my word for it. Look it up for yourself.
Visit: HeCheated.org and do your own research on males winning titles and prize money in women’s sporting categories.
Sort by sport, level of sport, place won, etc. If you’ve ever asked this question…go spend a few minutes on this site.
Reduxx reports on a variety of issues that impact women – you can readReduxx’s coverage of women’s sports here
Advocates and media consistently frame these tran[s] identified males as vulnerable, urging empathy and accommodation while quashing all discussions about women’s vulnerabilities. Whether in sports, restrooms, prisons or shelters, across the board women’s requests for compromise and concerns have been dismissed entirely…and more recently…met with vitriol and accusations of tran[s]phobia and big[o]try.
In the polarized debate surrounding tra[n]sgender issues, a contentious dynamic often goes unexamined: the expectation that women must prioritize compassion and inclusion toward these males even when it conflicts with their own comfort or sense of fairness, and they must overlook the fact that the most tr[a]ns identified males were socialized as privileged white males until adulthood, crime patterns mimic those of males and today – more than ever – and tra^n identified males are expected to participate in women’s spaces and sports and be accepted fully without any requirement for surgical or hormonal interventions.
Data highlights the tension: a 2023 Pew Research poll found 60% of Americans believe women’s rights are still unequal, yet policies like self-ID laws – already adopted in 12 U.S. states by 2025 – sideline a myriad of concerns about female-only spaces and crime statistics without robust public debate.
Inherently contradictory? Not really. Its the same old song and dance…reflecting the same broader societal pattern you already know deep down: the internalized psychological effects of a privileged white male socialization in adolescence carries with a person for their entire life. Post-tra^nsition too. Thus enabling the leveraging of institutionalized male power to shape media and broader societal narratives, and silence dissenting women’s voices.
The issue isn’t black-and-white and while I would like to believe empathy for struggles can coexist with valid concerns about fairness in sports and other concerns…the hostile silencing of women’s perspectives leaves women trying to straddle the fence with one option: pick a side.
Surprisingly (heartbreakingly?) their accusation tactics work like clockwork and many women support these policies, with a 2024 Gallup poll showing 55% of women favor tra[n]sgender inclusion in female spaces, though often with caveats about safety. And here you can groundhog day back to the first paragraph. And herein lies the problem, aye? When you actually talk to these women, they’re trying to straddle the fence…but they’ve never talked to a tra^ns activist to realize that their view is not acceptable to them.
“Women’s sex based rights and protections – for which women fought tirelessly – cannot be upheld and enforced when the category of “women” includes both males and females.”
just facts
it’s true!!